Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount of Rs. 10.79 crores alleged to arise from the land transaction had accrued to the assessee so as to be taxable in the relevant assessment year.
Analysis: The document executed between the parties was treated as a memorandum of understanding and not as a completed conveyance. No title or ownership in the immovable property was transferred, the possession was not handed over, and the contractual conditions for completion were not fulfilled. The advance of Rs. 21 lakhs was returned the very next day, which negatived the inference that the full consideration had become due or had been earned. Applying the concept of real income, the principles of accrual under section 5(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the definition of transfer in section 2(47) read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, the income could not be said to have accrued in the absence of an effective transfer or enforceable right to receive the consideration.
Conclusion: The alleged sale consideration did not accrue to the assessee and was not chargeable to tax in its hands.
Final Conclusion: The addition based on the alleged land transaction was unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Income is taxable only when it has actually accrued or arisen to the assessee through an enforceable right, and a mere memorandum of understanding without transfer of possession or completion of contractual obligations does not create taxable accrual.