TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal Orders Reconsideration of Charitable Trust's Tax Exemptions</h1> <h3>Vempati Chinna Satyam Kuchipudi Art Foundation Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax</h3> Vempati Chinna Satyam Kuchipudi Art Foundation Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - [2011] 10 ITR 201 Issues Involved: The denial of benefits under u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) and u/s 11 to a charitable institution.Issue 1: Denial of Benefit under u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) The assessee, a charitable trust engaged in imparting education in traditional arts, was denied the benefit of u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal examined whether the trust qualifies as an educational institution. Referring to judicial precedents, it was established that the trust need not be a formal educational institution to claim exemption. The Tribunal held that the trust, involved in imparting traditional art forms like Kuchipudi dance, qualifies for the benefit of u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) based on the broader interpretation of the term 'institution' by various High Courts. The Assessing Officer's denial of the benefit was deemed unjustified.Issue 2: Denial of Benefit under u/s 11 The benefit under u/s 11 was denied to the assessee due to alleged violations of u/s 13(3)(c)/(d) as funds were provided to one of the trustees for medical emergencies. The Tribunal analyzed the situation and concluded that the assistance provided was essential to save the trustee's life, who played a crucial role in managing the trust. Citing a judgment by the Madras High Court, it was emphasized that the transaction's substance and purpose must be considered. The Tribunal found that the trust's actions were in the interest of fulfilling its obligations and not for the undue benefit of the trustee. Consequently, the denial of the benefit under u/s 11 was deemed unjustified.In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the returns filed by the assessee for the relevant assessment years and grant the exemptions and benefits available under u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) and u/s 11. The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, emphasizing the justifiability of the benefits denied by the Assessing Officer.
TaxTMI 