Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the turnover of tin sheets, tin plates and similar goods was taxable under item 116 of the First Schedule to the Kerala General Sales Tax Act at 8% or under item 3(ii)(i) of the Second Schedule at 4%, and whether the revisional court should interfere with the Tribunal's finding that no material was adduced to support the lower rate.
Analysis: The classification of the goods turned on a mixed question of fact and law. The Tribunal found that the assessee had not produced documentary or other material sufficient to show that the goods fell within item 3(ii)(i) of the Second Schedule. In revision, the court would not reappraise that factual finding in the absence of material showing error. The burden lay on the assessee to substantiate the claim for the lower rate, and the Tribunal's statement that no such evidence was adduced could not be displaced in these proceedings.
Conclusion: The goods were held to fall under item 116 of the First Schedule to the Kerala General Sales Tax Act and be taxable at 8%, and no interference was warranted.