Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether "neel" (ultramarine blue) falls within the expression "pigment" in item No. 18 of Notification No. F. 5(22)FD/CT/70-7 dated 9th March, 1970 for the purpose of sales tax classification and whether it was liable to tax at the higher rate applicable to pigments or at the residuary rate.
Analysis: In construing entries in a taxing notification, the controlling approach is the meaning in common parlance, namely the sense in which the goods are understood by merchants, consumers and users, rather than any technical or scientific meaning. The expression "pigment" in the notification was used along with other colouring goods such as dyes, paints, varnishes and dry colours. On that basis, and having regard to ordinary trade understanding, "neel" (ultramarine blue) was treated not as a colour pigment but as a whitening agent used for laundry purposes. The later notification of 1977 specifically named ultramarine blue separately in the taxable list, which reinforced that, before that express inclusion, it was not covered by the earlier entry for pigments.
Conclusion: "Neel" (ultramarine blue) does not fall within the expression "pigment" in item No. 18 of the 1970 notification and was taxable only at the residuary rate of 7 per cent; the assessee succeeded on the reference.