Notice under escaped turnover rules and inclusion of administrative charges in purchase price upheld on statutory and contractual basis

A notice under section 21 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act is valid if it discloses the statutory basis for the assessing authority's reason to believe that turnover has escaped assessment; it need not set out detailed particulars of the escaped turnover. Administrative or arhat charges paid under a private procurement arrangement, including amounts paid to agents and the State Government on the facts stated, form part of the purchase price because they are consideration connected with the purchase. Those charges are therefore includible in the turnover of purchases, and the assessment including them is sustained.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether a notice issued under section 21 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act was invalid for not setting out detailed particulars of the alleged escaped turnover. (ii) Whether the administrative charges paid by the assessee to the State Government and agents formed part of the purchase price and were includible in the turnover of purchases.

Issue (i): Whether a notice issued under section 21 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act was invalid for not setting out detailed particulars of the alleged escaped turnover.

Analysis: The jurisdiction under section 21 depends on the assessing authority having reason to believe that turnover has escaped assessment, and that belief must be reflected in the notice. However, the statute does not require the notice to recite the detailed material or grounds on which that belief rests. The notice is invalid only if it fails to indicate the existence of the requisite belief at all.

Conclusion: The notice was not invalid merely because it did not contain detailed particulars of the escaped turnover.

Issue (ii): Whether the administrative charges paid by the assessee to the State Government and agents formed part of the purchase price and were includible in the turnover of purchases.

Analysis: Under section 2(gg), purchase price includes valuable consideration paid or payable for purchase and sums charged for anything done by the seller at or before delivery, while section 2(ii) brings the aggregate of purchase price into the turnover of purchases. Charges paid pursuant to a statutory levy may fall outside purchase price, but amounts paid under a private arrangement to agents for services connected with procurement retain the character of consideration. On the facts, the charges were treated as administrative or arhat charges paid to agents, including the State Government, and were therefore part of the purchase price.

Conclusion: The administrative charges were includible in the purchase price and in the turnover of purchases.

Final Conclusion: The revision failed, and the assessment including the disputed charges was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: A notice under section 21 is valid if it discloses the statutory basis of the assessing authority's reason to believe, and payments made as commission or administrative charges under a private procurement arrangement form part of the purchase price unless they are shown to be a statutory levy.

---