Successor dealer liability requires proof of entire business transfer, not mere sale of stock-in-trade or continued trading.

Liability of a successor dealer under section 19(1) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 arises only where the entire business is transferred as a going concern. The statutory presumption based on continuity of premises and goods applies only as an evidentiary aid, and the department must still prove transfer of the business, including ordinary assets and goodwill, with nothing substantial retained by the vendor. On the stated facts, only sale of stock-in-trade was established, with no proof of transfer of goodwill, assets, liabilities, or the running business. Section 19(1) was therefore not attracted, and successor liability could not be fastened.

---

---

Issues: Whether, on the facts found, the successor dealer could be treated as a transferee of the entire business within the meaning of section 19(1) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, so as to fasten liability for the transferor's unpaid tax.

Analysis: Liability under section 19(1) arises only when the ownership of the dealer's business is entirely transferred, and the statutory presumption in the explanation operates when a dealer carries on business in the same premises and substantially in the same goods in succession to the earlier dealer. The burden remains on the department to establish that the business as a going concern, including its ordinary business assets and goodwill, was transferred and that nothing substantial was retained by the vendor. On the Tribunal's factual finding, the only proved circumstance was sale of stock-in-trade, while there was no evidence of transfer of goodwill, assets, liabilities, or the business as a running concern.

Conclusion: The successor dealer was not shown to be an entire transferee of the business, and section 19(1) was not attracted. The question was answered in the affirmative against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: For fastening liability on a successor dealer under section 19(1), the department must prove an entire transfer of the business as a going concern, not merely a sale of stock-in-trade or continuity of trade in the same premises.

---