Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether reversal of 10% of the value of the exempted product was required where the disputed goods were a by-product and not a final exempted product; (ii) whether Cenvat credit was admissible when the inputs were traced through invoices issued by an unregistered dealer.
Issue (i): Whether reversal of 10% of the value of the exempted product was required where the disputed goods were a by-product and not a final exempted product.
Analysis: Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules applies where both dutiable and exempted final products are manufactured. The disputed acid oil was treated by the Department itself as a by-product. On that footing, it was not an exempted final product, and the reversal mechanism under Rule 6 did not apply.
Conclusion: The demand based on reversal of 10% of the value was not sustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether Cenvat credit was admissible when the inputs were traced through invoices issued by an unregistered dealer.
Analysis: The chain of movement of goods was established through the invoices and vehicle number, and the quantity and description of goods tallied. On that evidentiary basis, the credit was found to be supported notwithstanding the intervening unregistered dealer.
Conclusion: The credit was admissible and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on both disputed issues, while the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules applies only to exempted final products and not to a by-product; Cenvat credit cannot be denied where the documentary chain establishes receipt of goods despite the involvement of an unregistered intermediary.