Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reduction in the assessee's profit-sharing ratio on reconstitution of the firm and the admission of a new partner and a minor to the benefits of partnership amounted to a gift liable to gift-tax, and whether the transaction was supported by adequate consideration.
Analysis: The reconstitution was found to be real and not sham or nominal. The newly admitted partner contributed capital and, as a partner, assumed future liabilities and losses and the duty to exercise due diligence in the conduct of the business. These features constituted consideration and negatived the character of the transaction as a gift. The allotment of a share in profits to the minor, who had also brought capital into the firm, could not by itself be treated as a gift of the shares earlier held by the other partners. The separate question based on exemption under section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax Act was not gone into, as it did not survive.
Conclusion: The reduction in the assessee's share on reconstitution did not create any liability to gift-tax, because the admission of the new partner and the allotment of share were for consideration and were not gifts.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a partner is admitted to a firm on a genuine reconstitution and contributes capital while assuming partnership obligations and liabilities, the allotment of profit share is supported by consideration and is not taxable as a gift.