Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether service of the pre-assessment notice by affixture was valid under section 55B(b) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, and whether the assessee could be said to have "cannot be found" within the meaning of that provision.
Analysis: Section 55B(b) permits affixture only where the person to be served cannot be found. That expression was construed to mean a case where the person is dead or has disappeared, and not merely a case where the person was not seen at the time of attempted service. Where the assessee is alive and his whereabouts are known or can be ascertained, affixture on the shop premises does not satisfy the statutory requirement. The endorsement in this case showed only that the assessee was not seen and the notice was therefore affixed.
Conclusion: The service of notice was not valid in law. The Tribunal was right in holding that there was no valid service of the pre-assessment notice and in directing a fresh assessment after proper notice.