Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum of Rs. 1,60,000 set apart for the assessee's minor daughters was to be treated as a provision for reasonable educational expenses and exempt under section 5(1)(xii) of the Gift-tax Act.
Analysis: The amount was assessed in the context of the family's social and financial position, the period needed for education according to their standard of life, and the likely educational expenditure. The Tribunal made its own estimate and fixed Rs. 80,000 for each daughter as sufficient for education. Such an estimate was based on relevant considerations and could not be interfered with unless shown to be arbitrary or wrong. As the amount was held to cover education, it was unnecessary to go into the alternative question relating to marriage provision.
Conclusion: The provision of Rs. 1,60,000 was correctly construed as a provision for education and the answer was in favour of the assessee and against the Department.