Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale of tyres and tubes to the Gun Carriage Factory was in the course of import into India and therefore not liable to tax.
Analysis: The transaction was examined under section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act and article 286(1)(b) of the Constitution of India. The decisive question was whether the movement of goods from the foreign country to India was occasioned by the contract of sale and whether there was any scope for diversion of the goods for another purpose. On the material found by the Tribunal, the goods were imported pursuant to the contract for supply to the Gun Carriage Factory, and there was nothing to show a separate foreign sale inconsistent with the assessee's case. The condition laid down in the governing precedent was thus satisfied.
Conclusion: The sale was in the course of import and was exempt from tax, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the movement of goods from a foreign country to India is directly occasioned by the contract of sale and the goods are intended for delivery under that contract without scope for diversion, the sale is in the course of import and falls outside taxability under article 286(1)(b).