1985 (5) TMI 210 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Sales Tax Applies to 'Latex' Sale Proceeds as Non-Agricultural Income

The Court upheld the decision that the sale proceeds from 'latex' extracted by the assessee were subject to sales tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act. ... - Issues:1. Taxability of sale proceeds from 'latex' extracted by the assessee.2. Interpretation of agreements for the purchase of rubber trees and extraction of 'latex.'3. Applicability of sales tax on the sale of 'latex' under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act of 1957.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: The main issue in this case was the taxability of the sale proceeds from the 'latex' extracted by the assessee. The Commercial Tax Officer had brought the sale of 'latex' by the assessee under the purview of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act. The Deputy Commissioner initially allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, but the Commissioner, using suo motu power of revision, revised the orders and restored the taxability of 'latex' sales. The Court upheld the Commissioner's decision, stating that the sale proceeds from 'latex' were indeed exigible to sales tax under the Act.Issue 2: The Court analyzed the nature of the agreements entered into by the assessee for the purchase of rubber trees and the extraction of 'latex.' It was noted that the assessee had the right to cut and remove the rubber trees, extract 'latex,' and sell it in the open market. The agreements were not lease agreements but rather contracts for the sale of the extracted 'latex.' The Court referred to previous judgments and agreed that such income derived from the sale of extracted products did not qualify as agricultural income but fell under non-agricultural income, subject to sales tax.Issue 3: The Court considered the applicability of sales tax on the sale of 'latex' under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act. Relying on precedents and rulings from the Madras and Kerala High Courts, the Court concluded that the sale of 'latex' was indeed exigible to sales tax under the Act. The Court also referenced a previous case involving toddy tapping and sale, where a similar conclusion was reached regarding the taxability of such transactions. Ultimately, the Court dismissed the appeals filed by the assessee, directing each party to bear their own costs.In conclusion, the Court affirmed the taxability of the sale proceeds from the 'latex' extracted by the assessee, emphasizing that such transactions did not qualify as agricultural income but rather as sales exigible to tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act.