Agricultural income test for latex sales: contractual extraction from rubber trees was treated as taxable commercial sale activity.

Receipts from latex extracted by slaughter-tapping rubber trees under contractual arrangements were treated as taxable sales rather than agricultural income. The assessee had no ownership of the land and only a contractual right to cut and remove the rubber trees, extract latex and market it; the agreements were not leases of land. On that basis, the Court viewed the transaction as a commercial sale activity, not income derived from agricultural operations. The latex proceeds therefore did not fall within the concept of agricultural income and were exigible to sales tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

---

---

Issues: Whether the sale proceeds from latex extracted by slaughter-tapping rubber trees under the agreements were agricultural income or were sales exigible to tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

Analysis: The assessee was not the owner of the land and acquired only the contractual right to cut and remove the rubber trees, extract latex and sell it in the market. The agreements were not leases of land. On a critical examination of the agreements and the nature of the transactions, the extracted latex was treated as the result of a commercial sale transaction and not as income derived from agricultural operations. The reasoning was supported by earlier authorities dealing with similar contracts and the Court agreed with the view that such receipts did not fall within the concept of agricultural income.

Conclusion: The latex sales were not agricultural income and were exigible to sales tax under the Act, in favour of the Revenue.

---