Commercially distinct commodity test upheld for umbrella covers; textile fabric exemption denied and reassessment sustained.

Cutting and stitching umbrella cloth into umbrella covers was treated as manufacture of a commercially distinct article with a separate identity and specific utility. Because the processed product could no longer be used as ordinary cloth and was marketable only as an umbrella cover, it did not retain the character of textile fabrics or the related exemption. On that basis, the turnover from such goods was liable to tax, and reassessment of escaped turnover under section 12 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 was held to be properly invoked. The taxability of umbrella covers as a different commercial commodity was therefore upheld.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether cutting and stitching umbrella cloth to make umbrella covers amounts to manufacture of a different commodity so that the product ceases to be textile fabrics and remains liable to tax. (ii) Whether, on the facts of the connected references, reassessment of escaped turnover under section 12 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 was valid.

Issue (i): Whether cutting and stitching umbrella cloth to make umbrella covers amounts to manufacture of a different commodity so that the product ceases to be textile fabrics and remains liable to tax.

Analysis: The decisive test applied was whether the process produced a commercially distinct article having a separate identity and specific utility. Umbrella cloth, after being cut, stitched and shaped for fastening to umbrella ribs and handle, could no longer be used as ordinary cloth and was fit only as an umbrella cover. The finished product was treated as a marketable commodity with commercial value and not as textile fabrics in common parlance.

Conclusion: The process brought into existence a different commercial commodity, namely umbrella covers, and the exemption available to textile fabrics was not available. The finding was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

Issue (ii): Whether, on the facts of the connected references, reassessment of escaped turnover under section 12 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 was valid.

Analysis: Once umbrella covers were held to be taxable and not exempt textile fabrics, the turnover relating to them was liable to be assessed. The basis for treating the turnover as escaped turnover was therefore sustained, and the reassessment under section 12 was held to be properly invoked.

Conclusion: The reassessment of escaped turnover was valid. The finding was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The references were answered against the assessee, and the taxability of umbrella covers as a distinct commercial product was upheld together with the reassessment action.

Ratio Decidendi: Where processing of goods results in a commercially distinct and specifically usable article that is no longer capable of the original general use, the processed article is a different commodity for sales tax purposes and does not retain the original exemption.

---