Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the seizure of the goods by the sales tax authorities was justified in law and whether the goods were liable to be released forthwith.
Analysis: The goods were being transported for supply to a Government-owned corporation. The authorities had acted in a reckless and careless manner and the seizure was found to have caused unwarranted harassment. On the facts, the seizure could not be sustained as a lawful exercise of power.
Conclusion: The seizure was held to be unjustified in law, and the petitioner was entitled to release of the goods forthwith with costs and consequential damages in case of non-compliance.