Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in dismissing the sales tax appeal for default and in refusing restoration of the appeal, or whether the matter should have been restored and decided on merits.
Analysis: The petition arose out of an appeal under the sales tax law which had been dismissed for non-appearance and thereafter declined restoration. The Court held that dismissal in default is an exceptional course and should be exercised sparingly, not as a routine measure, particularly where the appellate forum is the final fact-finding authority and the party had taken steps before the hearing to seek adjournment. The Court also noted that, in the interests of justice, the appeal ought ordinarily to be heard on merits, and that a short adjournment on payment of costs was a more appropriate course than outright dismissal. The refusal to restore the appeal was therefore not justified on the facts.
Conclusion: The dismissal for default and the refusal to restore the appeal were unjustified; the petition succeeded and the appeal was directed to be restored for decision on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: Dismissal of an appeal for default should be resorted to only in exceptional cases, and where sufficient cause is shown or the interests of justice require, the appellate authority should prefer restoration and disposal on merits, with costs if necessary.