Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order of remand made by the revising authority had the effect of setting aside the original assessment as a whole and whether the fresh assessment made thereafter was in substitution of the original assessment.
Analysis: The remand order was not confined to a formal or limited direction leaving the earlier assessment intact. It required the Assessing Authority to reconsider specified matters and to return clear findings, showing that the original assessment could not survive in its previous form. Once the fresh assessment was made, the tax liability of the dealer was altered, which indicated that the later assessment operated as a new assessment in place of the earlier one. A reassessment made after such remand is treated as a second assessment in substitution of the earlier assessment that stood displaced.
Conclusion: The remand order had the effect of setting aside the original assessment as a whole, and the fresh assessment was in substitution of the original assessment, in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee, with the result that the reassessment was treated as replacing the original assessment.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessment is remanded for fresh determination of material issues and the later order alters the tax liability, the later assessment is a substitution of the earlier assessment and the original assessment does not remain intact.