Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tax collected for the pre-registration period could be retained and whether the assessee was entitled to refund after the assessment for that period was annulled.
Analysis: The assessment covering the entire pre-registration period was held to be unsustainable and was annulled in appeal. Once no valid assessment or lawful quantification of liability survived, the amount collected from the assessee could not be retained by the revenue. The governing principle is that tax cannot be collected or retained except in accordance with law, and any unauthorised collection offends the constitutional requirement that no tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law. The fact that the amount related to the dealer's own liability for the pre-registration period did not alter the position, because no lawful basis remained for the demand.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to refund of the tax collected, together with admissible interest, and the claim succeeded.
Final Conclusion: Tax realised without a valid assessment or lawful basis cannot be retained by the State and must be refunded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessment is annulled and no lawful quantification of tax liability remains, the revenue has no authority to retain the amount collected, and refund follows as a matter of constitutional and statutory right.