Appellate enhancement cannot restore a deleted penalty when the first appellate authority has annulled it completely.

Appellate power to enhance a penalty under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act does not extend to restoring a penalty that the first appellate authority has completely annulled for want of a finding of wilful non-disclosure of taxable turnover. Where the Appellate Assistant Commissioner deleted the penalty in full, there was no surviving penalty order capable of enhancement, and the Tribunal's attempt to levy penalty was therefore unsustainable. The turnover findings were not disturbed, but the penalty levy was rightly set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal could restore or impose penalty under the appellate power when the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had deleted the penalty for want of a finding of wilful non-disclosure of taxable turnover.

Analysis: The appellate power under section 36(3)(a)(i) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act permits confirmation, reduction, enhancement, or annulment of assessment or penalty. Once the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had completely set aside the penalty, there was no existing penalty that could be enhanced. The power to enhance does not include restoration of a penalty that had been annulled at the first appellate stage. The cited precedent was applied on the same facts, and the Tribunal's levy of penalty was therefore unsustainable. The remaining findings on turnover were not disturbed.

Conclusion: The Tribunal had no power, on the facts of the case, to restore the deleted penalty, and the levy of penalty was rightly set aside.

Final Conclusion: The revisions succeeded only on the penalty issue, while the assessment findings on the suppressed turnover were left intact.

Ratio Decidendi: The appellate power to enhance a penalty does not extend to restoring a penalty that has been completely deleted by the lower appellate authority.

---