Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Deputy Commissioner could invoke revisional power under section 21(2) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act in respect of turnover which the assessing authority had not applied its mind to and had omitted to tax.
Analysis: The distinction between escaped turnover and erroneous assessment was treated as controlling. Where the assessing authority had not applied its mind to a part of the turnover, that turnover was held to have escaped assessment, bringing the matter within the scope of reassessment under section 12-A. Revisional power under section 21(2) could not be used to trench upon that field, because the revising authority cannot assume the function reserved to the assessing authority for escaped turnover. The record showed that the disputed turnover had not been considered on merits by the assessing authority.
Conclusion: The Deputy Commissioner had no jurisdiction under section 21(2) to revise the assessment in respect of the disputed turnover, and the challenge by the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessing authority has not applied its mind to a disclosed turnover, the amount is to be treated as escaped assessment and can be dealt with only under the escaped-turnover provisions, not by revisional jurisdiction.