Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disputed turnover represented second sales of yarn eligible for exemption, or sales effected by the assessee as a selling agent on the mills' account.
Analysis: The contract between the assessee and the mills showed that the assessee was appointed only as a selling agent for the yarn produced by the mills. The assessee took delivery of the stock after making only provisional payments on the basis of provisional invoices, while the yarn was to be sold on the mills' account and at the price fixed by the mills. These terms indicated that the provisional invoices were only for interim payment and did not establish an actual sale from the mills to the assessee.
Conclusion: The disputed turnover was not second sales eligible for exemption. It was the first sale by the assessee as selling agent, and the assessee's claim failed.