Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether transport charges initially paid by the sugar mills for arranging carriage of sugarcane from the growers could be excluded from the purchase turnover as post-purchase expenses.
Analysis: The agreements and registration forms showed that the sugarcane growers remained bound to deliver cane at the mill premises. The arrangement of lorries by the mills was only a to enable timely transport and did not alter the contractual situs of delivery or convert the transaction into a purchase at the fields. The billing practice also treated the statutory price as the purchase price and the transport charges as amounts payable by the growers but advanced and later recovered by the mills. On these facts, the transport charges were not a separate element deducted from the purchase price but formed part of the amount recoverable in the course of the purchase transaction.
Conclusion: The transport charges could not be deducted from the assessable purchase turnover, and the claim for exclusion failed.
Final Conclusion: The revision cases were dismissed, with the assessment of the full statutory purchase price, without reduction of the transport charges, being upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the contract requires delivery at the buyer's premises and the buyer merely advances transport expenses later recovered from the seller, such charges are not post-purchase expenses deductible from the purchase turnover.