Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a Managing Director of a company could be proceeded against and arrested under the Revenue Recovery Act for recovery of sales tax arrears due from the company in the absence of any provision in the Sales Tax Act fastening personal liability on him.
Analysis: The Sales Tax Act was treated as a codifying fiscal enactment, and its liability provisions were confined to the dealer assessed to tax and declared a defaulter. The Act contained no express provision making a director or managing director personally liable for the company's sales tax arrears. Since the recovery machinery under the Revenue Recovery Act operated only through section 23(2)(a) of the Sales Tax Act against a person liable under that Act, proceedings could not be extended to a third party who was not a defaulter within the meaning of the statute. The arrest and detention also affected personal liberty and could not be sustained on the basis of a void recovery order.
Conclusion: The proceedings against the Managing Director were without jurisdiction and void, and the order of arrest and detention was quashed.
Final Conclusion: Recovery of the company's sales tax arrears could not legally be enforced against the Managing Director in the absence of statutory liability, and the illegal detention was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: In a codifying fiscal statute, liability cannot be extended by implication beyond the persons expressly made liable, and recovery proceedings cannot be taken against one who is not statutorily a defaulter.