Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ice-cream and ice-candy are cooked food and fall within item 8 of Part I of Schedule II appended to the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958.
Analysis: The question arose on a reference under section 44(1) of the Act. The Court followed the Full Bench decision on the same point, which had already held that ice-cream and ice-candy are not cooked food and do not come within item 8 of Part I of Schedule II. In the absence of any decision of a larger Bench or of the Supreme Court taking a different view, that conclusion was binding and governed the references before the Court.
Conclusion: Ice-cream and ice-candy are not cooked food and are not covered by item 8 of Part I of Schedule II appended to the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958.
Ratio Decidendi: A coordinate or smaller Bench must follow an existing Full Bench ruling on the same statutory question unless overruled by a larger Bench or by the Supreme Court.