Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether packing and forwarding charges collected at a uniform rate per crate were deductible under rule 6(4)(f) and (ff) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, 1957, or formed part of the sale price as pre-sale expenditure.
Analysis: The rules permit deduction only of freight or packing-related amounts that are not part of the price and are incurred as post-sale expenses or as incidents of sale after the sale is complete. The decisive enquiry is not the manner in which the invoice is framed, but whether the charges were incurred before the sale to make the goods available at the place of sale, or after the sale on behalf of the purchaser. Uniform charges by themselves do not conclusively show that the amount is unrelated to actual freight or handling expenses. On the facts, the authorities had proceeded on the assumption that the charges necessarily represented pre-sale activities, without adequately determining where the sale was completed and whether the amount was collected as an incident of sale.
Conclusion: The claim for deduction could not be rejected on the existing material, and the matter required reconsideration by the assessing authority after giving the petitioner an opportunity to adduce evidence.