Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, who received old and condemned brass utensils in the course of selling new utensils and sold such articles as scrap, was covered by the definition of "manufacture" under the U.P. Sales Tax Act so as to make the sale of brass scrap taxable.
Analysis: The statutory definition of "manufacture" was wider than its ordinary meaning and included producing, making, mining, collecting, extracting, altering, ornamenting, finishing or otherwise processing, treating or adapting goods. Even so, the word "collecting" had to be read in the context of the definition as a whole, namely as part of a process leading to a new or distinct commercial commodity. Mere receipt of old and condemned utensils in the course of trading in new utensils, and their sale in the same form, did not amount to a manufacturing process. No new commercial commodity emerged, and the assessee's activity could not be treated as manufacture within the statutory meaning.
Conclusion: The assessee was not covered by the definition of "manufacture", and the sale of brass scrap consisting of old and condemned utensils was not taxable on that footing.
Ratio Decidendi: An activity falls within an extended statutory definition of manufacture only if it results in, or forms part of a process yielding, a new or distinct commercial commodity; mere collection or resale of goods in the same form does not constitute manufacture.