Reassessment limitation and opportunity principles: court stay time is excluded, but prior accepted deposits cannot be added again.

For limitation under section 153, the period during which reassessment proceedings remained stayed by court order was excluded, and the Explanation was treated as applicable to reassessment as part of the assessment proceeding. The assessee could not rely on its own stay order to exhaust limitation, so the limitation objection failed. On opportunity and disclosure, the reassessment was upheld because notice under section 148 had been served, no return was filed, and the assessee did not rebut the material relied on; no prejudice from nondisclosure was shown. However, inclusion of Rs. 2,25,200 was not sustained because it had already been accepted in the original assessment and no fresh material justified its addition in reassessment.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the period during which reassessment proceedings were stayed by court order was to be excluded while computing limitation under section 153, and whether the Explanation applied to reassessment proceedings; (ii) Whether the assessee was denied reasonable opportunity in the reassessment proceedings or deprived of disclosure of the material used by the Assessing Officer; (iii) Whether inclusion of the sum of Rs. 2,25,200 was permissible in reassessment, and whether that part of the addition was barred as a matter falling under section 147(b).

Issue (i): Whether the period during which reassessment proceedings were stayed by court order was to be excluded while computing limitation under section 153, and whether the Explanation applied to reassessment proceedings.

Analysis: Section 153 governs the time limit for completion of assessment, reassessment and recomputation. The Explanation is attached to the entire section and the phrase used in clause (ii), namely "assessment proceeding", was held to cover reassessment as well, having regard to the inclusive definition of assessment in section 2(8). The Court held that a party cannot take advantage of its own act in obtaining and continuing a stay order so as to run out the limitation period. The time during which the proceedings remained stayed by the court was therefore required to be excluded.

Conclusion: The limitation objection failed and was decided against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the assessee was denied reasonable opportunity in the reassessment proceedings or deprived of disclosure of the material used by the Assessing Officer.

Analysis: The assessee had been served with notice under section 148 long before the reassessment was completed, had not filed a return despite opportunity, and had also not produced any material to rebut the circulation figures relied upon by the Assessing Officer. The material forming the basis of reopening was sufficiently known to the assessee, and the assessee's own conduct showed continued non-cooperation. In those circumstances, no denial of reasonable opportunity or nondisclosure causing prejudice was established.

Conclusion: The challenge based on want of opportunity and nondisclosure was rejected and the finding was against the assessee.

Issue (iii): Whether inclusion of the sum of Rs. 2,25,200 was permissible in reassessment, and whether that part of the addition was barred as a matter falling under section 147(b).

Analysis: The amount had been accepted in the original assessment as a deposit after explanation from the assessee and was not the subject of the reopening notice on a basis that would justify its later inclusion as reassessment income. Since there was no suppression or fresh material in respect of that amount, its inclusion in the reassessed figure was not sustained. To the extent the Revenue sought to bring it in by a different route, the Court held that the matter was barred and the Tribunal had erred in sustaining that component.

Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 2,25,200 was deleted and this part was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The reassessment was upheld on the questions of limitation and opportunity, but the inclusion of Rs. 2,25,200 could not stand; the result was therefore only partly in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: For purposes of limitation under section 153, the period during which reassessment proceedings are stayed by court order is excluded, and a taxpayer cannot rely on its own obtained stay to defeat reassessment; however, an amount already accepted in original assessment without fresh basis cannot later be sustained in reassessment.

---