Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessing authority could enhance the tax rate from 2% to 6% and complete the assessment without issuing notice to the assessee and affording an opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The assessee's return specifically claimed that part of the turnover was taxable at 2% under the statutory provision governing concessional tax treatment, while the assessing authority proposed to tax the entire turnover at 6%. Once the return as to the applicable rate was not accepted, the authority was required to put the assessee on notice and hear her before raising the tax burden. The absence of such opportunity amounted to non-compliance with the mandatory statutory requirement and offended the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The assessment made without notice and hearing was unsustainable, and the challenge by the assessee succeeded.