Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the show cause notice was sustainable when it invoked Modvat provisions that had already been substituted by Cenvat provisions on the date of issuance.
Analysis: The demand was based on Modvat provisions even though those provisions had been substituted by the Cenvat regime through Notification No. 27/2000-C.E. (N.T.) dated 31.03.2000. On the date of the show cause notice, the earlier Modvat provisions were no longer in force and there was no saving clause preserving them for such invocation. The notice was therefore founded on provisions that were not available in the statute book when it was issued.
Conclusion: The show cause notice was not sustainable and the appeal succeeded on that ground.