Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ravva falls within the expression "rice" under entry 66 of the First Schedule to the A.P. General Sales Tax Act, and whether its sale is therefore taxable or exempt as a second sale.
Analysis: The decisive consideration was the ordinary understanding of the commodity under the relevant tariff entry. Rice had already been held to include parched rice and puffed rice, and the process by which rice is converted into ravva was treated as no more elaborate than those processes. The later amendment introducing a separate entry for ravva was not material to the period in dispute. The earlier precedent governing rice in the statutory entry was therefore applied to the commodity in question.
Conclusion: Ravva was held to be rice within entry 66, and its sale was held to constitute a second sale not liable to tax.
Final Conclusion: The revisions were rejected because the commodity was treated as falling within the existing rice entry, with the result that the assessee's claim to exemption succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: A commodity falls within a schedule entry according to its ordinary commercial understanding, and a less elaborate processed form of rice remains rice for purposes of the sales tax entry.