TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether freight charged on despatch formed part of the sale price and was exigible to tax; (ii) whether the estimated price of tins and gunny bags used as packing materials was includible in the taxable turnover; (iii) whether penalty under section 43(1) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 was rightly sustained.
Issue (i): whether freight charged on despatch formed part of the sale price and was exigible to tax.
Analysis: The goods were sold f.o.r. Indore less railway freight or lorry hire, whichever was lower, and the railway receipts were freight to pay. The contract showed that delivery was complete when the goods were handed over to the carrier and the risk passed at that stage. Since the freight was separately borne by the buyer and deducted in the bills, it could not be treated as part of the sale price.
Conclusion: The freight did not form part of the sale price and was not exigible to tax. The finding was in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): whether the estimated price of tins and gunny bags used as packing materials was includible in the taxable turnover.
Analysis: No express contract for sale of the containers was found, and no separate price or composite price for the packing materials was shown. The existence of a possible resale value was insufficient to infer an implied sale. In the absence of proof of an agreement to sell the packing materials, their estimated value could not be taxed as turnover.
Conclusion: The estimated price of tins and gunny bags was not includible in the taxable turnover. The finding was in favour of the assessee.
Issue (iii): whether penalty under section 43(1) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 was rightly sustained.
Analysis: The concession recorded before the Tribunal showed that the omission from turnover was not explained as arising from legal advice or a genuine belief. In that situation, the Tribunal was justified in maintaining the penalty order under section 43(1).
Conclusion: The penalty under section 43(1) was rightly sustained. The finding was against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by holding that freight and packing materials were not taxable as part of turnover, but the penalty under section 43(1) was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Freight separately borne by the buyer under the contract does not form part of the sale price, and packing materials are not taxable as turnover unless an express or implied sale of them is proved; penalty for concealment may be sustained where the assessee fails to show a bona fide omission.
TaxTMI 
