Commissioner's attempt to force late-filing penalty initiation u/s271(1)(a) via s.263 revision rejected; assessee wins

The dominant issue was whether the Commissioner could invoke revisionary jurisdiction under s.263 of the Income-tax Act to direct the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings under s.271(1)(a). Applying binding HC precedent, the Court held that penalty proceedings are distinct from assessment proceedings; therefore, omission to initiate penalty does not render the assessment order "erroneous" for purposes of s.263, and the Commissioner lacks jurisdiction to revise an assessment solely to mandate penalty initiation. Consequently, the Tribunal was correct in quashing the Commissioner's direction, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

---

---

The High Court of Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the Commissioner cannot pass an order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act pertaining to penalty proceedings. The court referred to a previous judgment in Addl. CIT v. J.K.D'Costa [1982] 133 ITR 7 to support its decision.

---