Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under section 16(3) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, was leviable when the assessment notices had the payment-demand portion scored out because of stay orders and the tax was paid only after the stay was vacated.
Analysis: Interest under section 16(3) is a statutory incident of non-payment within the time specified in the notice of assessment or instalment order. The scoring out of the demand clause in the assessment notices was only because the Court's stay orders prohibited the authorities from making the usual demand, and the dealers themselves had obtained and benefited from those orders. The absence of a formal demand in the notice could not be used to defeat the statutory liability to interest. A stay order does not suspend the operation of the charging provision for interest, and interlocutory protection cannot confer an unintended immunity once the main proceedings have failed.
Conclusion: Interest under section 16(3) was payable, and the objection to its levy failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where tax is assessed and the assessee obtains a stay that prevents a formal demand from being issued, the assessee cannot rely on the absence of that demand to avoid the automatic statutory liability to interest on delayed payment.