2010 (2) TMI 1018 - AT - Customs

Truck seizure overturned on appeal due to doubts about driver's statement and lack of evidence

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREV.), LUCKNOW Versus SHEO SHANKER JAISWAL

The case involved the seizure and detention of a truck loaded with sugar near the border, with the driver's statement indicating smuggling into Nepal. The ... - Issues:1. Seizure and detention of a truck loaded with sugar near the Indo-Nepal border.2. Confiscation of the sugar and truck, imposition of penalties, and subsequent appeal.3. Validity of the statement recorded from the truck driver under Section 107 of the Customs Act, 1962.4. Admissibility and evidentiary value of the driver's statement recorded in the presence of police officers.5. Presence of injuries on the driver indicating duress during statement recording.6. Lack of corroborative evidence supporting the allegation of smuggling sugar into Nepal.7. Interpretation of legal provisions regarding the recording of statements under the Customs Act.Analysis:1. The case involved the interception of a truck near the border loaded with sugar, leading to its seizure and detention by the customs authorities. The truck driver's statement indicated the sugar was destined for Nepal, prompting the issuance of a show cause notice proposing confiscation of the sugar and penalties on involved parties.2. The Additional Commissioner ordered the confiscation of the truck and sugar, with penalties imposed. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) set aside this order, leading to the Revenue filing appeals challenging the decision.3. The key issue revolved around the validity of the driver's statement recorded under Section 107 of the Customs Act. The statement was crucial in alleging the smuggling of sugar into Nepal, but its admissibility and evidentiary value were questioned.4. The presence of police officers during the recording of the driver's statement raised doubts about its validity under Section 26 of the Indian Evidence Act. The lack of evidence showing proper authorization for recording the statement further weakened its credibility.5. Notably, the driver's injuries during a medical examination suggested the statement might have been obtained under duress, casting doubt on its reliability and truthfulness.6. The absence of corroborative evidence supporting the allegation of smuggling, apart from the driver's statement, undermined the case against the involved parties, leading to a dismissal of the Revenue's appeals.7. The judgment highlighted the importance of procedural compliance and the necessity for valid and untainted evidence in such cases, emphasizing the need for proper authorization and adherence to legal provisions for recording statements under the Customs Act.