Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether mixing dyes with gobar salt, soda-bi-carb and soda-ash to reduce strength amounts to manufacture or merely resale of goods, and whether the assessee is entitled to deduction of purchases from registered dealers under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969.
Analysis: The decisive test is whether, after the process is applied, the original commodity ceases to be commercially the same article and comes to be recognised as a new and distinct commodity. Mere treatment or manipulation does not amount to manufacture unless a transformation occurs and a commercially different product emerges. On the facts, reducing the strength or concentration of dyes by adding inert substances did not change the essential character of the dyes; the product remained dyes in commercial sense, though of reduced strength. The process therefore did not result in manufacture, and the sales remained resales.
Conclusion: The process did not amount to manufacture and the assessee was entitled to the claimed deduction; the answer was in favour of the assessee and against the State.
Ratio Decidendi: Manufacture takes place only when processing brings into existence a commercially new and distinct commodity, and mere reduction in strength or concentration without loss of essential identity does not satisfy that test.