Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a khandasari sugar manufacturer was entitled to claim exemption from purchase tax under the notification issued for sugar factories during May and June 1978.
Analysis: The words "sugar" and "sugar factory" were not defined in the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The charging provision in section 25-B of the Act treated purchase tax on sugarcane as applicable at the point of purchase, while the Fifth Schedule, entry 31-B, exempted sugar other than sugar-candy, confectionery and the like. In the absence of a statutory definition, the expression had to be understood in its ordinary and widest sense, and the notification also used the expression "sugar factories" without restriction. On that basis, the term covered factories manufacturing all types of sugar, including khandasari sugar.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification, and the refusal to extend the exemption was not justified.
Final Conclusion: The purchase tax exemption applied to the petitioner's khandasari sugar factory for the notified period, and relief was granted by mandamus.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxing statute or exemption notification does not define "sugar" or "sugar factory", the expression must be construed in its ordinary and widest sense, so as to include all types of sugar manufacture unless the text clearly limits the exemption.