Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale of ash separated from kolshi by sieving could be treated as a resale of the goods originally purchased so as to qualify for deduction under section 7(ii) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969.
Analysis: The statutory definition of "resale" in section 2(26) permits deduction only where purchased goods are sold in the same form, or without any act amounting to manufacture, or without any act taking them out of the relevant description in the schedules. The assessee had purchased kolshi, which was coal in a mixed form, and after sieving sold the separated ash. Ash and kolshi were held to be distinct commercial commodities, and ash was not the same commodity as the kolshi purchased. The sale of ash therefore could not satisfy the requirement of resale in the same form, nor could it be regarded as a sale of coal without altering its description under the relevant schedule.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to deduct the sales of ash under section 7(ii); the question was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: Deduction was disallowed because the commodity sold after separation was not the same goods as those purchased, and the statutory conditions governing resale were not fulfilled.
Ratio Decidendi: For a sale to qualify as a resale under the relevant sales tax definition, the purchased goods must remain the same commodity in law and in substance, and failure of any one statutory condition defeats the deduction.