Commercially distinct commodity test: pinning siali leaves did not create a new taxable goods category.

Processing of siali leaves by pinning them together did not create a commercially different commodity, because the essential identity of the leaves remained unchanged and the material could be restored to its earlier form. On that basis, siali khalli was treated as the same goods as the original leaves, so no fresh sales tax liability arose on its sale. The Tribunal's annulment of the tax was therefore upheld in the commentary as consistent with the principle that a separate taxable commodity comes into existence only when processing produces a distinct commercial article.

---

---

Issues: Whether siali leaves pinned together as siali khalli became a commercially distinct commodity so as to attract sales tax as a separate goods at the point of sale, and whether the Tribunal was justified in annulling the tax levied on khallis prepared out of siali leaves on which purchase tax had already been paid.

Analysis: The governing test is whether processing of the original commodity brings into existence a commercially different and distinct article. Mere change in form or presentation does not create a new taxable commodity if the essential identity remains intact. On the facts, pinning siali leaves together only made them more convenient for use and did not destroy their original identity. The material could also be restored to its earlier form by removing the pins, and the commercial use of the leaves and khallis remained substantially the same.

Conclusion: Siali khalli was not a distinct commercial commodity from siali leaves, and no fresh tax liability arose on its sale as an unspecified goods. The Tribunal was right in annulling the tax.

Ratio Decidendi: A commodity is taxable as a separate goods only when processing results in a commercially different and distinct article; where the original identity remains substantially unchanged, no new taxable commodity comes into existence.

---