Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty could be imposed under section 11(3a) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 when a dealer's cheque tendered with the return towards tax payment was dishonoured.
Analysis: Section 10(3) required a registered dealer to pay the tax due before furnishing the quarterly return and to file the prescribed receipt, though payment could also be made in another prescribed manner. Section 11(1) dealt with failure to furnish a return accompanied by the required receipt and was directed to defaults in filing the return. Section 11(3a), introduced later, separately covered a default in making payment of tax. A dishonoured cheque meant that the tax had not in fact been paid as required by section 10(3), and the default was therefore one in payment of tax rather than a mere failure to accompany the return with a receipt.
Conclusion: Penalty was rightly leviable under section 11(3a), and the question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.