1980 (7) TMI 248 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Agarbattis Taxed as Luxury Goods: High Court Decision Upheld

Kamaru Zuman Khan Versus State of Orissa

The High Court determined that agarbattis should be taxed as a luxury good under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, classified as an article of perfumery. The ... - Issues:1. Whether agarbattis should be taxed as 'perfumery' article under the Orissa Sales Tax Act.2. Interpretation of the term 'perfumery' in the context of luxury goods classification.3. Advisory jurisdiction of the Court under Section 24 of the Sales Tax Act.Detailed Analysis:1. The case involved a reference under Section 24(1) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act regarding the taxation of agarbattis as 'perfumery' items. The Additional Sales Tax Tribunal referred the question to the High Court to determine if agarbattis should be taxed as luxury goods under a specific entry in the Rate Chart, despite being classified as non-luxury goods. The issue revolved around the classification of agarbattis as perfumery for tax purposes.2. The Orissa Sales Tax Act, specifically Section 5, outlines the tax imposition scheme based on a prescribed rate for taxable turnover. The State Government is authorized to fix varying tax rates, not exceeding thirteen percent, for different sale transactions. In this case, the dealer in agarbattis had paid tax at different rates for specific periods. The dispute arose when the classification of perfumery was changed to luxury goods, leading to a higher tax rate imposition on agarbattis. The question of whether agarbattis fall under the category of perfumery, now classified as luxury goods, was central to the dispute.3. The Court deliberated on the interpretation of 'perfumery' in the context of luxury goods classification. The Assistant Commissioner initially ruled that agarbattis do not qualify as luxury goods under the category of perfumery. However, the Tribunal overturned this decision and upheld the higher tax rate on agarbattis. The Court referred to a Supreme Court decision that clarified the broad interpretation of 'perfume' to include items like dhoop and dhoop-batti, which are considered perfumery. The Court emphasized that if agarbatti falls under the definition of 'perfume,' it would be classified as perfumery and subject to taxation as a luxury good.4. Regarding the advisory jurisdiction of the Court under Section 24 of the Sales Tax Act, the Court rejected the argument that it could not decide on the classification of agarbatti as perfumery and luxury goods. The Court asserted its authority to examine and determine whether agarbatti constitutes luxury goods based on existing law and precedents. Ultimately, the Court concluded that agarbattis should be taxed as an article of perfumery falling within the purview of luxury goods classification, as per the Rate Chart provided under the Orissa Sales Tax Act.In conclusion, the High Court answered the reference by affirming that agarbattis should be taxed as an article of perfumery classified under luxury goods, aligning with the decision of the Additional Sales Tax Tribunal.