Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether neon signs sold by the assessee were covered by the expression "electrical goods" in entry No. 18 of the First Schedule to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941.
Analysis: The article had to be classified according to its real commercial character and the sense in which the expression was used in sales tax law. Although the signs depended upon electricity for illumination at night, they remained usable and intelligible even without electricity, because the letters were visible in the daytime and did not cease to serve their advertising function when power was absent. Goods that are truly electrical are those which cannot function at all without electricity; the mere fact that an article uses electricity for one aspect of its utility does not necessarily make it an electrical good. Applying that test, the neon signs were not articles whose use was exclusively or essentially dependent on electrical energy.
Conclusion: The neon signs were not "electrical goods" and did not fall within entry No. 18.
Ratio Decidendi: For sales tax classification, an article is not "electrical goods" merely because electricity enhances one mode of its use; it must, in substance, be an article that cannot function as such without electrical energy.