Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a demand for penalty under section 13(2) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act could be sustained when the assessee had been permitted to repay the refunded tax in instalments and had complied with that instalment order, in the light of the Government circular stating that no penalty should be imposed on tax arrears due prior to 1st September, 1976.
Analysis: The liability to penalty under section 13 arose only when the dealer neglected to pay tax when it became due. A direction permitting repayment in instalments protected the assessee so long as the instalments were paid as ordered, and the assessee in this case had discharged the entire amount within the period fixed by the Commissioner. The circular issued by the Commissioner pursuant to Government instructions further indicated that no penalty was intended for arrears due before 1st September, 1976. Section 3-A required subordinate officers to act in accordance with the Government's and Commissioner's instructions, and by the relevant date no arrears remained outstanding against the petitioner.
Conclusion: The penalty demand was unsustainable and was quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where tax is repaid in instalments under an authorised order and the instalments are duly honoured, penalty for default cannot be levied under section 13(2) unless there is an actual failure to pay an instalment when due, and binding governmental instructions under section 3-A must be followed.