Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether handloom shawls and lohis sold by the assessee were exempt from sales tax under the U.P. Sales Tax Act for the assessment years 1959-60, 1960-61 and 1961-62 by virtue of item 18 of Notification No. ST-911/X dated 31 March 1956, as amended, and the later notifications relating to handloom cloth and handloom shawls and lohis.
Analysis: The exemption notifications issued under section 4 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 had to be read harmoniously so that none of them became redundant. If item 18 of the 31 March 1956 notification were construed broadly to cover all handloom cloth, the later notification of 21 October 1959 granting exemption to printed or embroidered handloom cloth would become otiose. The retrospective amendment inserting dhoties, sarees and bedsheets into item 18 was therefore confined to non-printed and non-embroidered goods. As to shawls and lohis, the specific notification of 16 February 1962 exempted them expressly, whether plain, printed or embroidered, only from that date onward, showing that they were not covered earlier by item 18.
Conclusion: Handloom shawls and lohis were not exempt for the assessment years 1959-60 and 1960-61. They were exempt only from 16 February 1962 to 31 March 1962 in the assessment year 1961-62, and not for any earlier period.
Ratio Decidendi: Exemption notifications under a fiscal statute must be construed harmoniously, and a later specific exemption indicates that the goods were not already covered by an earlier general entry where such a reading would render the later notification redundant.