Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether transfer of goods under hire-purchase amounted to resale under the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959, and whether such transfers attracted the second proviso to section 7(2)(b) of the Act.
Analysis: The transactions were examined in their substance rather than their form. Hire-purchase was treated as a commercial method of sale in which the decisive factor was the dealer's intention to pass property in the goods to the hirer. Where the transactions were entered into with the ultimate object of resale and most of them had in fact ripened into sales, the goods could not be said to have been utilised for any purpose other than resale. The reference to the ultra vires explanation to section 2(p) could not assist the revenue, and the second proviso to section 7(2)(b) was held inapplicable on the facts.
Conclusion: Transfer of goods under hire-purchase amounted to resale, and the second proviso to section 7(2)(b) did not apply. The questions were answered in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by holding that hire-purchase transfers in the facts of the case were for resale and did not justify inclusion in the purchaser's taxable turnover under the second proviso.
Ratio Decidendi: For sales tax purposes, a hire-purchase transaction is to be judged by its real substance and the dealer's intention; if the arrangement is entered into for resale and to pass property to the hirer, it is not a use of the goods for a purpose other than resale.