TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court upholds Tribunal's decision on valuation of Hindu undivided family assets for wealth tax</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax Versus D. Krishna Murthy</h3> Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax Versus D. Krishna Murthy - [2000] 243 ITR 509, 123 TAXMANN 177 Issues:1. Valuation of assets of a Hindu undivided family for wealth tax purposes.2. Application of section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act for valuation.3. Determination of the value of land and building owned by an individual and a Hindu undivided family.4. Correct approach for valuing interconnected assets of a Hindu undivided family.Analysis:1. The case involved the assessment of a Hindu undivided family and an individual for the assessment years 1983-84 and 1986-87. The assets in question were a residential building and land owned by the family. The Income-tax Officer valued the assets separately, but the appellate authority and the Tribunal accepted the assessee's claim to value them together under section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act.2. The main issue revolved around the application of section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act for valuing the land and building owned by the individual and the Hindu undivided family. The provision allows the owner of a house used exclusively for residential purposes to value it based on certain criteria. The appellate authority and the Tribunal deemed this provision appropriate for valuing the interconnected assets in this case.3. The Tribunal valued the building at Rs. 5,03,054 and the land at Rs. 1,50,000 under section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act. The valuation was based on the fact that the building, though owned by the individual, was used by all members of the Hindu undivided family for residential purposes. The approach of valuing the assets together and then allocating values to the building and land separately was considered correct.4. The court concluded that since the building was used exclusively for residential purposes by the Hindu undivided family members, and the karta had erected the building on the family's land, the interconnected nature of the assets warranted a combined valuation approach. Therefore, the Tribunal's decision was upheld, and the questions were answered in favor of the assessee against the Revenue.Overall, the judgment clarified the correct approach for valuing interconnected assets of a Hindu undivided family and upheld the application of section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act in this particular case.
TaxTMI 