Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether a revision lay to the Commercial Taxes Tribunal from the Commissioner's order under section 31(5) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959; (ii) whether the Tribunal's order remanding the matter to the Commissioner for fresh decision was legally justified.
Issue (i): The question was covered by prior binding authority, and the Commissioner's order passed under section 31(5) was held to be revisable under section 31(2). The reference to the revisional forum was therefore competent.
Conclusion: The first issue was answered in the affirmative and in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (ii): The assessee's challenge to the ex parte assessment included the contention that the enhanced turnover had no basis and that the Commissioner had not examined the material bearing on that objection. The Tribunal found that the point had been raised but not considered, and that the enhancement required proper scrutiny with reference to the available materials. On that footing, the Tribunal was competent to remit the matter for fresh consideration.
Conclusion: The second issue was answered in the affirmative and in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's revisional jurisdiction was upheld, and its remand direction was sustained as legally valid.
Ratio Decidendi: An order of the Commissioner under section 31(5) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959 is revisable under section 31(2), and where material objections to an assessment have not been properly considered, the Tribunal may validly remit the matter for fresh determination.