1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court Order: Delay Condoned, Department Can Raise Contentions</h1> The Supreme Court of India in 2009 (2) TMI 740 - SC Order, condoned the delay and disposed of the Special Leave Petition against the decision of the ... Admission of application u/s 245D - Held that:- Since this Special Leave Petition is filed only against the order of the Settlement Commission admitting the application of the assessee under section 245D no interference at this stage required. As on the point of maintainability of the Application, it would be open to the Department to raise the contention before the Settlement Commission who would be entitled to examine that question at the final hearing of the matter. The Supreme Court of India in 2009 (2) TMI 740 - SC Order, condoned the delay and disposed of the Special Leave Petition filed against the decision of the Settlement Commission admitting the application of the assessee under section 245D of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court did not interfere at that stage but allowed the Department to raise contentions on maintainability before the Settlement Commission during the final hearing.