Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported reverse osmosis membrane qualified for exemption under Notification No. 6/2007-C.E. dated 01.03.2007 as water purification equipment based on reverse osmosis technology, and whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery should be granted.
Analysis: The exemption covered water purification equipment based on specified technologies, including reverse osmosis technology using thin film composite membrane. The imported item was only a reverse osmosis membrane and not the complete water purification equipment. On a reading of the notification with the tariff entries, the complete equipment alone was eligible for the nil rate of duty, while parts of such equipment were separately classifiable under sub-heading 8421 99 and did not fall within the exemption. The appellant also did not establish a prima facie case or plead financial hardship.
Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to waiver of pre-deposit or stay, and was directed to pre-deposit the entire duty demand.