Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed Modvat credit under Notification No. 29/96-C.E. could be denied on the ground that the assessee had taken credit on light diesel oil treated as a consumable, and whether subsequent reversal of that credit removed the bar to availment of deemed credit.
Analysis: The notification denied deemed credit where a manufacturer availed credit in respect of the specified inputs used in the manufacture of the specified final products. The Tribunal held that light diesel oil used as fuel fell within the expression "consumable", and therefore credit taken on such input attracted the restriction in the notification. However, it also accepted the settled principle that once the entire credit taken on the disputed input is reversed, the position is to be treated as if no credit had been taken. On that basis, the reversal of credit on light diesel oil cured the objection based on condition 4 of the notification.
Conclusion: The denial of deemed Modvat credit was unsustainable after reversal of the credit on light diesel oil, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the notification.
Final Conclusion: The demand of duty could not be sustained and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where credit taken on a disputed input is fully reversed, the legal effect is to place the assessee in the position as if no credit had been taken for purposes of the restriction on deemed credit under the exemption notification.