Deemed Dividend Assessment Limitation: Notices must be served within the assessment-year limitation or assessments are time-barred.

Deeming fiction that undistributed assessable income is treated as dividend on the date of the general meeting does not create a separate assessment process; such deemed dividends must be assessed under the ordinary assessment machinery and within the limitation period measured from the end of the relevant assessment year. Consequently, a notice of assessment served after the four-year limitation period following that assessment year is time-barred and the assessment is invalid. A later administrative order giving effect to the deeming does not extend the time for serving the assessment notice.

---

---

Issues: Whether the notice under section 34(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act served on 1 April 1954 for deemed dividends created by an order under section 23A(1) of the Income-tax Act was served within time or was out of time.

Analysis: Section 23A(1) creates a deeming fiction that undistributed assessable income of a company is deemed to have been distributed as dividend on the date of the general meeting if, by the end of the sixth month after that meeting, dividends distributed are less than sixty per cent. However, section 23A does not itself provide a separate assessment machinery; assessments must be made under section 34 of the Income-tax Act. The limitation periods in section 34(1)(a) and (b) begin from the end of the assessment year. Applying the assessment year principle, the deemed distribution on the date of the general meeting (4 December 1948) falls within the accounting year 1948 and assessment year 1949-50. The notice for assessment under section 34(1)(b) therefore had to be served within four years from the end of that assessment year. A notice served on 1 April 1954 was beyond that four-year period and thus outside the time permitted by section 34(1)(b). The Court rejected the submission that application of the limitation in section 34(1)(b) would render section 23A unworkable and clarified that an order under section 23A, even if made later, does not extend the time for service of the notice required by section 34(1)(b).

Conclusion: The notice served on 1 April 1954 under section 34(1)(b) was out of time; the assessment was invalid. The appeals by the Commissioner fail and are dismissed with costs.

Final Conclusion: The decision confirms that deemed distributions under section 23A(1) must be assessed within the limitation period prescribed by section 34(1)(b) calculated from the end of the relevant assessment year; notices served after that period are time-barred and the assessments founded on them are invalid.

Ratio Decidendi: An order under section 23A(1) creates a deeming fiction of dividend distribution but assessments of such deemed dividends must be initiated under section 34 within the limitation period measured from the end of the relevant assessment year; failure to serve notice within that period renders the assessment out of time.

---