Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued under section 34(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act for bringing to tax the deemed dividend under section 23A(1) was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The deemed distribution under section 23A(1) was treated as having taken place on the date of the general meeting, so the relevant accounting and assessment year remained the year in which that meeting was held. Even though section 23A(1) empowered the Income-tax Officer to pass the order without fixing a separate time limit, the shareholder's assessment still had to be made through section 34(1)(b), and the notice had to be served within four years from the end of the assessment year. The time limit for reassessment began from the end of the assessment year, and the proviso to section 34(3) did not govern the issue framed for decision.
Conclusion: The notice served on 1 April 1954 was out of time, and the assessment was barred by limitation. The decision was in favour of the assessee.