Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Deputy Commissioner could exercise suo motu revision under section 32(2)(b) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, when the assessment order had already been made the subject-matter of appeal before the appellate authority.
Analysis: The statutory bar in section 32(2)(b) applies once the order has been made the subject of an appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner or the Appellate Tribunal, or of a revision in the High Court. The bar is attracted by the fact that the order itself has been appealed against; it is not necessary that every part of the order should have been raised in appeal. On that basis, the Deputy Commissioner had no jurisdiction to interfere by suo motu revision.
Conclusion: The revisionary interference was without jurisdiction and the challenge failed.